Respected sir,
Here i am present my views regarding these three questions,
1) This first question is very debatable, because both T.S. Eliot and Friedrich Nietzsche are different in their views but both are right in their views. so as per Nietzsche's views he said that believes in your , Faith in self, and God is dead.and talked about " superman". so, faith in self is good, and we have such a good examples like Buddha , and Christ , but latter on they became God and people start worshiping.on the other side Eliot was very religious person, and that's why he used various example of Myths, and Buddhism, Hinduism etc. And through this he put his idea well, he talked on universal psyche. Eliot is regressive as compared to Nietzche. Eliot achieved universality .
2) T.S. Eliot and Freud both are contemporary, and both are right in their views though they different. Because Eliot was religious man, and that's why he talked about that repressed your ' Primitive instincts' and he talked about salvation and spirituality, through this he he try to preserve the nation and culture also. on the other side Freud talked as per psychologist's view that don't repressed your any wishes because which is very harmful, even in Primitive instincts also. Osho also said same things in the book " Sambhog se samathi " that it is also a way for spirituality. In the movie Fire by Deepa Mehta, we find that how Radha and sita fulfilled their repressed desires, in different way. so most of the people can't repressed their desires. In the case of Eliot, we notice that when we read his autobiographical views we find some unconscious view and some real life element also present .
3) In The Waste land , he uses many references of Indian religious. Through this he try to gave the universal touch of his idea on spiritual degradation and sexual perversion. In last part " What the thunder said" he used such things from Upnishad,
e.g.
“Ganga was sunken, and the limp leaves waited for rain,
While the black clouds Gathered far distant, over Himavant.”
Eliot uses the three " Da" which is taken from " Brihadaranyaka Upanishad". Means...
1.Datta.... Be Giver
We have to be giver. For sake of humanity, lots of people
scarified their life also because only blood purify the evils. Humanity
are survived only because of such people. so, it is said that....
" Blood is thiker than Water."
2. Dayadhvam....Sympathies
Everybody is in his prison because of self ego. And self is the key
to come out from it but really it is very difficult task.
3. Damyata........Self Control
Everything is burning in waste Land. Boat as body and Fishing and
fished, through this we find that Western culture has bad connotation
with sexual perversion and spiritual draught. So, Self control is the
most important.
Original lines of the poem which suggest above three meanings, like..
“DA
Datta: What have we given?
My friend blood shaking my heart
The awful daring of a moment's surrender
Which an age of prudence can never retract
By this, and this only, we have existed
Which is not to be found in our obituraies
or in memories draped by the beneficient spider
Or under seals broken by the lean solicitor
In our empty rooms
DA
Dayadhvm: I have heard the key
Turn in the door once and turn once only
We think of the key, each in his prision
Thinking of the key, each confirms a prison
Only at nightfall, aetherial rumours
Revive for a moment a broken coriolanus
DA
Damyata: The boat responded
Gsily, to the hand expert with sail and oar
The sea was calm, your heart would have
responded
Gaily, when invited, beating obedient
To controlling hands
I sat upon the shore
Fishing, with the arid plain behing me
Shall I at least set my lands in order?
London Bridge is falling down falling down falling
down
Poi S'ascose nel foco che gli affina
Quando fiam ceu chelidon- O swallow swallow
le prince d'Aquitaine a la tour abolie
These fragments I have shired against my ruins
Why then lle fit you. Hieronymo's mad againe.
Datta. Dayadhvam. Damyata.
Shantih Shantih Shantih “